Comments on: Does Go Gvo (a network marketing company) offer a legitimate business opportunity? http://www.businessopportunityofthefuture.com/network-marketing-opportunities/does-go-gvo-a-network-marketing-company-offer-a-legitimate-business-opportunity Discussions And Ideas On Business Opportunities Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:47:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: moneyreligion http://www.businessopportunityofthefuture.com/network-marketing-opportunities/does-go-gvo-a-network-marketing-company-offer-a-legitimate-business-opportunity/comment-page-1#comment-628 moneyreligion Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:53:59 +0000 http://www.businessopportunityofthefuture.com/network-marketing-opportunities/does-go-gvo-a-network-marketing-company-offer-a-legitimate-business-opportunity#comment-628 Run away from ANY mlm. The money in mlm is to sell the SYSTEM. The money is all in the system.<br><b>References : </b><br> Run away from ANY mlm.

The money in mlm is to sell the SYSTEM.

The money is all in the system.
References :

]]> By: weebler76 http://www.businessopportunityofthefuture.com/network-marketing-opportunities/does-go-gvo-a-network-marketing-company-offer-a-legitimate-business-opportunity/comment-page-1#comment-627 weebler76 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:39:59 +0000 http://www.businessopportunityofthefuture.com/network-marketing-opportunities/does-go-gvo-a-network-marketing-company-offer-a-legitimate-business-opportunity#comment-627 I don't believe it is legitimate. I don't think it's blatantly illegal, but there are some gray areas that could be argued either way. I don't think it's a good opportunity for a number of reasons. Company - I have not seen anything bad about the company, but GVO is a relaunch of Kiosk. I'm wondering if Kiosk was as good as they claim why not just improve on it instead of completely relaunching with another name? It appears to be just another GDI with a higher price so they can pay higher commissions. Also GVO stands for Global Virtual Opportunities. That leaves me wondering, are the in the webhosting business or did they just decide to build an MLM company and threw in a product/service so that they would have an argument that it was legal? The name suggests the latter to me. Product - It's overpriced to allow them to pay higher commissions. From reviews I've read their hosting isn't as reliable as they claim. Most everyone seems to be in agreement that support is good and responds quickly. With the high price for the services you actually receive you are unlikely to sell webhosting to anyone who does not want to promote the biz opp. That creates two potential problems. The first is that you have limited your market. The second is potential legal concerns about selling a biz opp rather than a real product. Compensation - They claim to have the best compesation plan in MLM. What company doesn't make that claim? They can't all be the best. They do pay higher commissions than some other companies like GDI, but that's to be expected since they are charging almost 4 and a half times what GDI charges. What is their selling point after the next company comes along and charges more and pays a higer commission then claims they have the best comp plan? There are other companies out there with much better comp plans and higher commissions paid on products people want and need. I don't like the "binary balancing act" or any type of closed matrix. It confuses people. If the comp plan isn't simple enough to explain to a dumby in a couple of minutes I'd avoid it even if everything else about the company is good. You get a lot of people who sign up just thinking that they can do absolutely nothing and get paid (this is actually mentioned on some of the pages I saw). When they don't get as much spillover as they expect or don't get it as quickly as they expect they quit and badmouth the company. Being in a closed matrix with limited depth limits your earning potential. They require you to personally recruit 14 people to earn another spot in the matrix. There are many other companies out there without the forced matrix that will allow you to earn much more than GVO with fewer personal recruits and encourage people to build rather than promote laziness. I may be wrong here, but off hand I can't think of any companies who have had much long term success with a binary or limited matrix type comp plan. Timing - Right now they are using the same "groundfloor" message that every new MLM uses. It is not a groundfloor opportunity it is a new opportunity in an industry that is flooded with competitors that offer a better service at a lower price. If groundfloor is your biggest selling point then long term you don't have a very good opportunity. It is simply a "me too" opportunity with an inflated price to support an inflated comp plan.<br><b>References : </b><br> I don’t believe it is legitimate. I don’t think it’s blatantly illegal, but there are some gray areas that could be argued either way. I don’t think it’s a good opportunity for a number of reasons.

Company – I have not seen anything bad about the company, but GVO is a relaunch of Kiosk. I’m wondering if Kiosk was as good as they claim why not just improve on it instead of completely relaunching with another name? It appears to be just another GDI with a higher price so they can pay higher commissions. Also GVO stands for Global Virtual Opportunities. That leaves me wondering, are the in the webhosting business or did they just decide to build an MLM company and threw in a product/service so that they would have an argument that it was legal? The name suggests the latter to me.

Product – It’s overpriced to allow them to pay higher commissions. From reviews I’ve read their hosting isn’t as reliable as they claim. Most everyone seems to be in agreement that support is good and responds quickly. With the high price for the services you actually receive you are unlikely to sell webhosting to anyone who does not want to promote the biz opp. That creates two potential problems. The first is that you have limited your market. The second is potential legal concerns about selling a biz opp rather than a real product.

Compensation – They claim to have the best compesation plan in MLM. What company doesn’t make that claim? They can’t all be the best. They do pay higher commissions than some other companies like GDI, but that’s to be expected since they are charging almost 4 and a half times what GDI charges. What is their selling point after the next company comes along and charges more and pays a higer commission then claims they have the best comp plan? There are other companies out there with much better comp plans and higher commissions paid on products people want and need. I don’t like the "binary balancing act" or any type of closed matrix. It confuses people. If the comp plan isn’t simple enough to explain to a dumby in a couple of minutes I’d avoid it even if everything else about the company is good. You get a lot of people who sign up just thinking that they can do absolutely nothing and get paid (this is actually mentioned on some of the pages I saw). When they don’t get as much spillover as they expect or don’t get it as quickly as they expect they quit and badmouth the company. Being in a closed matrix with limited depth limits your earning potential. They require you to personally recruit 14 people to earn another spot in the matrix. There are many other companies out there without the forced matrix that will allow you to earn much more than GVO with fewer personal recruits and encourage people to build rather than promote laziness. I may be wrong here, but off hand I can’t think of any companies who have had much long term success with a binary or limited matrix type comp plan.

Timing – Right now they are using the same "groundfloor" message that every new MLM uses. It is not a groundfloor opportunity it is a new opportunity in an industry that is flooded with competitors that offer a better service at a lower price. If groundfloor is your biggest selling point then long term you don’t have a very good opportunity. It is simply a "me too" opportunity with an inflated price to support an inflated comp plan.
References :

]]>